Aston Villa Fans Tear into ONE Player Who Was the Bad Egg Even With the Win Against Brighton
Aston Villaâs recent victory against Brighton & Hove Albion should have been a moment of pure celebration for the Villa faithful. A hard-fought win, a testament to the teamâs resilience and Unai Emeryâs tactical nous, was secured at Villa Park, sending the fans into raptures. The 2-1 triumph showcased Villaâs attacking flair and defensive grit, with goals from Ollie Watkins and Morgan Rogers proving decisive. Yet, amidst the jubilation, a dark cloud lingered over the performance of one player, who has since become the focal point of fan frustration. That player? None other than Emiliano BuendĂa.
The Argentine midfielder, once heralded as a creative genius capable of unlocking defenses with a flick of his boot, has found himself under intense scrutiny. Despite the win, Villa fans took to social media platforms like X and fan forums to vent their spleen, pinpointing BuendĂa as the âbad eggâ whose lackluster display nearly cost the team dearly. Itâs a curious caseâhow can a player on a winning side attract such ire? Letâs dive into the match, the fansâ reactions, and why BuendĂa has become the lightning rod for discontent.
The game itself was a rollercoaster. Brighton, known for their possession-based style under Roberto De Zerbi, came to Villa Park with confidence. They controlled large spells of the first half, with their intricate passing patterns leaving Villa chasing shadows at times. However, Villaâs counter-attacking prowess shone through. Watkinsâ clinical finish in the 23rd minute gave the home side the lead, and Rogersâ second-half strike seemed to seal the deal. Brighton pulled one back late through Simon Adingra, setting up a nervy finish, but Villa held firm. On paper, it was a classic Emery masterclassâabsorb pressure, strike on the break, and defend with discipline.
So where does BuendĂa fit into this narrative of triumph? The 28-year-old started in the No. 10 role, tasked with linking midfield and attack, a position where his vision and technical ability should thrive. Yet, throughout the 68 minutes he was on the pitch, BuendĂa was a shadow of the player Villa fans fell in love with during his Norwich City days. His stats from the game tell a damning story: zero shots, zero key passes, a pass accuracy of just 73%, and a staggering 12 instances of losing possession. For a player expected to be the creative heartbeat, these numbers are unforgivable, win or no win.
Fans were quick to pounce. On X, one supporter wrote, âBuendĂa was an absolute passenger today. How does he lose the ball that many times and offer nothing going forward? Embarrassing even in a win.â Another chimed in, âEmery needs to wake up and drop BuendĂa. Heâs a liabilityâBrighton couldâve punished us if they were sharper.â The sentiment was echoed across Villa fan groups, with many pointing to his lack of intensity and poor decision-making as the reasons Villa struggled to assert dominance in midfield.
Itâs worth noting that BuendĂaâs season has been a mixed bag. After missing the entirety of the 2023-24 campaign due to a devastating ACL injury, his return was met with optimism. Fans hoped the flair and guile that saw him rack up 15 goals and 16 assists in Norwichâs 2020-21 Championship-winning season would resurface. But 2024-25 has been a slow burn. While heâs shown flashes of brillianceâmost notably a stunning assist in a draw against Manchester Unitedâconsistency has eluded him. Against Brighton, that inconsistency morphed into outright mediocrity, and the fansâ patience appears to have snapped.
What makes this backlash particularly fascinating is the context of the win. Villa took all three points, climbing into the upper echelons of the Premier League table and keeping their European ambitions alive. Historically, a victory papers over cracks, but not this time. The Villa faithful, perhaps emboldened by the high standards Emery has set, refused to let BuendĂaâs subpar showing slide. Itâs a sign of how far the club has comeâmediocrity is no longer tolerated, even in victory.
Some might argue the criticism is harsh. BuendĂaâs role requires risk-takingâthreading passes through tight spaces inevitably leads to turnovers. Brightonâs high press also made life difficult for Villaâs midfield, with John McGinn and Youri Tielemans also struggling at times. Yet, the spotlight remains on BuendĂa, perhaps because of the pedestal heâs been placed on. When he joined Villa for a then-club-record ÂŁ33 million in 2021, he was billed as the marquee signing to elevate the team. That promise, coupled with his injury setbacks, has created a narrative where every misstep is magnified.
Emery, ever the pragmatist, substituted BuendĂa in the 68th minute for Jacob Ramsey, a move that shifted the gameâs momentum. Ramseyâs energy and directness helped Villa regain control, further highlighting BuendĂaâs deficiencies. Post-match, Emery was diplomatic, praising the teamâs collective effort but sidestepping direct criticism of individuals. However, his decision to hook BuendĂa early speaks volumesâhe saw the same flaws the fans did.
Where does this leave BuendĂa? At 28, heâs at a crossroads. His talent is undeniable, but the Premier League demands more than sporadic moments of magic. Villaâs aspirationsâChampions League football, a sustained title challengeârequire every player to pull their weight. If BuendĂa canât adapt to Emeryâs high-intensity system, his days as a starter could be numbered. The emergence of Ramsey and the versatility of players like Rogers only heighten the pressure.
For now, the Villa fansâ ire serves as a wake-up call. The win against Brighton was a step forward, but BuendĂaâs performance was a glaring blemish. As one fan poignantly put it on X, âWe won in spite of BuendĂa, not because of him.â Whether he can silence the critics and reclaim his status as a fan favorite remains to be seen. For now, though, heâs the bad egg in an otherwise golden victoryâand the Villa faithful wonât let him forget it.