Manchester United legend Paul Scholes has never shied away from giving his blunt assessments, and this week he has turned his attention to Newcastle United, suggesting that Eddie Howe missed a golden opportunity to freshen up his squad by letting go of underperforming players. According to Scholes, the Magpies should have sanctioned exits for Miguel Almirón and Callum Wilson during the recent transfer window, claiming both no longer fit the trajectory of the club’s ambitions.
Speaking on a punditry panel, Scholes argued that Newcastle’s project under Howe has reached a point where ruthless decisions are necessary if they want to cement themselves as a consistent top-four contender. Almirón, despite his tireless work rate, has been singled out for lacking the cutting edge needed at the highest level. Scholes noted that while the Paraguayan attacker enjoyed a purple patch in 2022, his overall output since then has been inconsistent, with goals and assists drying up at crucial moments.
As for Wilson, Scholes highlighted his worrying injury record and declining sharpness in front of goal as reasons Newcastle should have cashed in. The striker, once considered their most reliable finisher, has struggled to maintain fitness and has been outshone by Alexander Isak, who is now firmly established as Howe’s main forward. Scholes believes that by keeping Wilson, Newcastle risk relying on a player whose best days might be behind him, rather than investing in a younger, more durable option.
“Newcastle are a good side, but if you’re talking about really pushing on, you’ve got to be brutal,” Scholes said. “Almirón and Wilson have given everything, but this team has to evolve. Sometimes sentiment can hold you back.”
For Newcastle fans, the remarks may sting, as both players have played key roles in recent seasons. Yet, Scholes’ comments reflect a growing debate around whether Howe should be more aggressive in reshaping his squad. If the Magpies fail to meet expectations this campaign, the decision to keep faith in Almirón and Wilson may be looked back on as a costly mistake.