WagwanvibesControversy continues to swirl following Crystal Palace’s 2–1 defeat to Everton, after substitute Christantus Uche appeared to strike James Tarkowski during a heated late-game altercation. The incident, which occurred in the closing minutes, has left fans debating whether the Nigerian forward should face retrospective punishment.
Former Premier League referee Mark Clattenburg has now shared his insight and according to him, the Palace striker is unlikely to face any FA action despite what many believe was a clear act of violent conduct.
The Incident That Sparked Debate
Uche, who came off the bench in the 89th minute, became involved in a tussle with Tarkowski moments later. Replays showed what looked like a short punch to the Everton defender’s midsection. VAR immediately reviewed the incident for violent conduct, but no red card was issued.
Many supporters expected the FA to step in afterward, but Clattenburg has poured cold water on that speculation.
Clattenburg’s Verdict: “It’s Been Dealt With”
Speaking to We Are Palace, the former FIFA referee said:
“It was certainly violent conduct, and Uche should have been sent off. But since VAR checked it, the FA won’t re-open the case. Once VAR reviews an incident, it’s considered dealt with even if the decision appears wrong.”
Clattenburg further explained that in the modern VAR era, the FA rarely revisits cases unless officials completely miss the event. Because VAR viewed the footage and decided against a red card, the decision will stand.
What It Means for Crystal Palace
The decision comes as a relief for Palace, who are already short on attacking options. Uche will now remain eligible for selection before joining Nigeria for the Africa Cup of Nations, which will see him miss part of January’s fixtures.
While the incident has sparked fierce debate, Clattenburg’s comments underline a simple truth in today’s VAR-dominated football, once an incident is reviewed, the book is effectively closed.
admin
Wagwanvibes
Oojays_gram